Skip to main content











Obama's East Asia Wish List


The President of the United States, Barak Obama is visiting various countries in East & Southeast Asia from the 13th of November 2009. That he chose East Asia as his first stop in Asia as the US President underlines the importance of the region for his regime and for the United States as such. At its basic, Obama’s Asia visit has three major agenda points; North Korea, trade imbalance and trade war with Japan and China and the future of Climate Change.
Besides these issues of immediate importance, there are other issues of particular American interest in East Asia. Obama will try to reassert the importance of the American military umbrella for the region, something which is being doubted by the present day Japan under the newly elected Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama. The Democratic Party of Japan has signalled its wish for a more independent foreign policy. In the first few days of the Hatoyama government, the US has shown some flexibility vis-à-vis Japan when it agreed to Japan’s stoppage of refuelling in the Indian Ocean. How the relations progress on the Futenma airbase in Okinawa which is opposed by many in Japan will decide the future course of relations between the two countries. Thus, Obama’s visit will focus on ironing out the difference of expectations of DPJ led Japan and the US on each other’s role in the region. Obama will hope to sort it out early as he would not want it to reflect on other aspects of cooperation like climate change, North Korea and trade relations which are equally important for the two.
As mentioned above, North Korea’s aggressive posturing, its nuclear test earlier this year and attempted missile test does not augur well for normalisation of tensions in Asia. It’s unlikely that US would attack North Korea since there is little to gain from a direct confrontation with the belligerent regime of Kim Jong il. However, given the rise in the nuisance value of North Korea, exemplified by its recent skirmish with the South Korean Navy, the world wants it to come to the Six Party talks as soon as possible. Facilitating this reengagement of North Korea and ending of provocative language is one of the immediate objectives of the trip.
The North Korean issue will be discussed in Tokyo and also in Beijing. More than any other group, the Communist Party of China enjoys the trust of the North Korean regime. China also has its stakes in the engagement with the North Korean regime and its stability since it shares a long border. In Beijing, Obama would be keen to hear the Chinese perspectives on handling the question of North Korea.
Second item on Obama’s Beijing itinerary would be the relations with the People’s Republic of China. China is extremely important for US; politically as well as economically. Under Obama, US-China relations have been mixed, although more positive than negative. There have been talks of G2 comprising US and China as the driving force behind the world economy which shows their closeness but at the same time China has accused US of increased protectionist behaviour when it increased import duties on Chinese tyres. It has also accused US, although less formally, of harbouring secessionist Rabiya Kadder and her supporters. There is also speculation whether Obama will touch the issue of human rights of minorities in Xinjiang and in Tibet since the memories of the July 5 riots of Urumqi are still fresh. However, it looks unlikely as the geopolitical reality has changed significantly since the global economic meltdown. Even when Hilary Clinton visited China earlier this year as Secretary of State, she was tight-lipped on the issue of human rights.
On the subject of climate change, the US and China have a bilateral understanding but both are noncommittal on emission reductions for some reason or other. Much of the Copenhagen success will depend on what approach the two countries take on the subject. Obama has been trying to get some support for his domestic initiatives on mitigation front. He will have to engage China more meaningfully on the issue of climate change if he wishes to see the bill passed in the Senate where democrats are well short of the required numbers because his domestic constituency is not convinced of his ability to take his climate agenda outside the US. At the same time, he will also have to convince China that the American climate bill will not harm China by imposing trade restrictions.
Obama’s East Asia trip is important also from the point that this is the first one since the American markets crashed last year. American recovery has been fuelled partly by the continued trust shown by East Asia in the American treasury bonds. Obama will try to convince the regional leaders abut the trajectory of recovery in the American economy when he meets ASEAN leaders in Singapore.
Obama’s idea of hope has generated a lot of optimism about his ability to bring about positive change on the idea of United States. As far as East Asia is concerned, Obama himself will rely on the hope that his wish list comes true in the desired timeframe as it would redefine the role of the United States vis-à-vis East Asia in the changing world order.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Blame China? We are a House Divided One of the articles published in the Chinese Institute for International and Strategic Studies has talked of the ease with which India can be divided into 20-30 parts in the future to prevent the country from rising as a strategic rival for the top spot in Asia and in the world. This article has invoked a lot of heat and debate in India. This was expected given the fact that China is India’s rival and a strategic adversary in most of the situations. It is also somewhat surprising given the norms governing international relations that no one speaks so blatantly of dividing the neighbour, even if one so desired, more so if you take pride in your ‘peaceful rise’ in international relations. Moreover, the policy of beggar thy neighbour is simply dated in the era of economic cooperation and nuclear weapons. Even as the analysts in India get angry about the perception of certain Chinese scholar about India, they must not lose sight of the fact that the

Civil Military Relations and Media

In India, civil military relations have been strained in the recent past due to a couple of instances. First, it was the date of birth controversy about the serving Chief of the Army. It involved a few missing documents and a legal tangle. Even as it was solved with all honours retained, other set of controversies seem to have emerged. These new controversies perhaps have been blown out of proportion, probably because the DoB controversy was still fresh in mind. During this second phase of the controversy, corruption, under-performance and under-preparedness came into picture.  However, the icing on the cake was the whole supposed coup expose by the Indian Express. Figment of imagination, undoubtedly at its worst, was at play in creating a script that would crate yet another dud like Agent Vinod! Has the media been mature on reportage and expose? Its one thing for a letter to be leaked, but its completely different for the media to publish it without even giving it a second thou
संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन की विदेशनीती: आत्मविश्वास का अभाव अविनाश गोडबोले 2009 मे हुए चुनाव के बाद फिर एक बार कॉंग्रेसके नेतृतवमे संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन ने सरकार बनाया . इन चुनाओमे वामपंथी दल और समाजवादी पार्टी जैसे भूतपूर्व साथियोंको भारी नुकसान हुआ और UPA मे कॉंग्रेस का स्थान मज़बूत हो गया . इसका यह परिणाम अपेक्षित था के नयी सरकार एक सकारात्मक विचारधारा लेकर आगे चलेगी और देशके भविष्य के बारेमे दिशा दर्शक काम करेगी . 1996 से 2009 तक भारतमे बने हरेक सरकार मे मुख्य पार्टी कमज़ोर रही है और प्रादेशिक अथवा वैचारिक गठबंधन डालो की स्थिति मज़बूत और निर्णायक रही है. परिणामी सरकारोँकी नीतीयाभी छोटे दलोँके हितअनुसार बदलती रही है. जब 2009 के चुनाव मे कॉंग्रेस ने सबसे ज़्यादा सीट्स पाई थी. तब यह अंदाज़ जताया गया था की उसकी मज़बूती उसके आत्मविश्वास मे परिवर्तित हो सकती है लेकिन पिछलेएक साल का विश्लेषण करतहुए भारतीय विदेशनीतिमे ऐसा कोई बदल या ऐसी कोई घोषणा दिखाई नही दी है. 26/11 के हमलो के बाद पाकिस्तान पर दबाव डालकर वहांके सरकार क