Skip to main content
Contradictory Tendencies in the India-China Relationship: Does it help the bilateral relationship?

In the last one year, India and China have had a contradictory relationship. And in more ways than one, what happened in the last one year epitomises the future of the relationship between the two countries. On the one hand, trade and investment figures are touching a new high each year, bilateral visits and interactions at multiple levels have increased manifold, trust on each other’s activities and intentions in multilateral forums is at a never seen before high. At the same time, bilaterally, there has been a gradual downswing since for the first time the Chinese Ambassador to India claimed Arunachal Pradesh as part of China in late 2006. Add to it the list of cross border intrusions by the Chinese forces, the media outcry in India over the intrusions, the role of Chinese media over the Dalai Lama and Chinese media’s ignorance about the nature of Indian media, the picture becomes as grim as it could get.
The argument here is that this could be a good thing to push for greater bilateral engagement despite the prevailing contradictions for the future of India China relations for various reasons. First, decoupling from the past of the bilateral relationship is one urgent requirement as far as India China relations are concerned if one seeks an imagined and possible future. It is in the sense that there is a need to move beyond accusing Nehru’s idealism regarding Mao’s China or the contested history of 1962 in order to form a strong basis for the future normalisation of the relationship. As long as one keeps looking at the historical events as the cause of the present state of affairs, one is likely to fail in gauging and planning for the future course of India China relations. Contradictory trends necessarily force one to adopt a perspective that is essentially different from idealism based or civilisational determinism; thus making it more grounded in realism as well as forward looking.
 Second, the contradiction creates the rationale for greater engagement exactly like it has done in the case of US China relations. There are a lot of similarities here. US and China have completely different views over many issues including Taiwan, Tibet, Human Rights, Democracy, and in the recent past over Xinjiang, Environment, Trade Practices and so on. However, this did not stop them from greater engagement and from benefiting out of each other’s capabilities. And even when voices continued to be raised over these issues, it did not bother the US in getting cost effective business out of a communist non democratic state. For its part, China did not mind accepting investments from a neo-imperial power. In short, neither was apologetic about the contradictions and after three decades of engagement, one sees the theory of complex interdependence in action, which is at its peak at the moment. Similarly, India and China will have to learn to live with the contractions they face and engage because they face all these contradictions. Thus, the contradictions will and should create raison d'etre for the deeper and neutral understanding of each other.
Third, contradictions will be the defining feature of the future of the bilateral relations between India and China. India will rise to a power status in the international order and China would like to avoid having India competing for strategic space in any field. At the same time both have much to gain from each others’ economic experiences. Besides their obvious rise and competitiveness over shared strategic space there are other compelling reasons why both will not be able to ignore each other. India’s democratic experience will be the biggest attraction for the Chinese people and worry for its leadership and Chinese growth rates will be equally attractive for India. This is perhaps the biggest contradiction. Even then, despite the contradictions, undertaking policies aimed at engagement is the best possible way foward.
Fourth, India has more to benefit by managing the contradictory relationship as by this process, it will create a stake in the Indian growth story for the Chinese entrepreneurs which could then in turn compel the leadership to relook at some of its other policies in the South Asian region; China-Pakistan relations for example could take different shape if Chinese perceptions on the India story changed with its engagement with India. However, this is going to be a necessarily long term process.
The first step towards creating engagement amidst contradictory interests would be about managing the trust deficit and then reducing it gradually over a period of time. Over the period of time, India can try and create bridges between the economic and political aspects of the relations, between the bilateral and regional and also between bilateral and multilateral issues. Thus, India can take the contradictions in its stride and design a forward looking China policy.

THIS POST HAS BEEN PUBLISHED ON THE IDSA WEBSITE AS WEB COMMENT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Blame China? We are a House Divided One of the articles published in the Chinese Institute for International and Strategic Studies has talked of the ease with which India can be divided into 20-30 parts in the future to prevent the country from rising as a strategic rival for the top spot in Asia and in the world. This article has invoked a lot of heat and debate in India. This was expected given the fact that China is India’s rival and a strategic adversary in most of the situations. It is also somewhat surprising given the norms governing international relations that no one speaks so blatantly of dividing the neighbour, even if one so desired, more so if you take pride in your ‘peaceful rise’ in international relations. Moreover, the policy of beggar thy neighbour is simply dated in the era of economic cooperation and nuclear weapons. Even as the analysts in India get angry about the perception of certain Chinese scholar about India, they must not lose sight of the fact that the

Civil Military Relations and Media

In India, civil military relations have been strained in the recent past due to a couple of instances. First, it was the date of birth controversy about the serving Chief of the Army. It involved a few missing documents and a legal tangle. Even as it was solved with all honours retained, other set of controversies seem to have emerged. These new controversies perhaps have been blown out of proportion, probably because the DoB controversy was still fresh in mind. During this second phase of the controversy, corruption, under-performance and under-preparedness came into picture.  However, the icing on the cake was the whole supposed coup expose by the Indian Express. Figment of imagination, undoubtedly at its worst, was at play in creating a script that would crate yet another dud like Agent Vinod! Has the media been mature on reportage and expose? Its one thing for a letter to be leaked, but its completely different for the media to publish it without even giving it a second thou
संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन की विदेशनीती: आत्मविश्वास का अभाव अविनाश गोडबोले 2009 मे हुए चुनाव के बाद फिर एक बार कॉंग्रेसके नेतृतवमे संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन ने सरकार बनाया . इन चुनाओमे वामपंथी दल और समाजवादी पार्टी जैसे भूतपूर्व साथियोंको भारी नुकसान हुआ और UPA मे कॉंग्रेस का स्थान मज़बूत हो गया . इसका यह परिणाम अपेक्षित था के नयी सरकार एक सकारात्मक विचारधारा लेकर आगे चलेगी और देशके भविष्य के बारेमे दिशा दर्शक काम करेगी . 1996 से 2009 तक भारतमे बने हरेक सरकार मे मुख्य पार्टी कमज़ोर रही है और प्रादेशिक अथवा वैचारिक गठबंधन डालो की स्थिति मज़बूत और निर्णायक रही है. परिणामी सरकारोँकी नीतीयाभी छोटे दलोँके हितअनुसार बदलती रही है. जब 2009 के चुनाव मे कॉंग्रेस ने सबसे ज़्यादा सीट्स पाई थी. तब यह अंदाज़ जताया गया था की उसकी मज़बूती उसके आत्मविश्वास मे परिवर्तित हो सकती है लेकिन पिछलेएक साल का विश्लेषण करतहुए भारतीय विदेशनीतिमे ऐसा कोई बदल या ऐसी कोई घोषणा दिखाई नही दी है. 26/11 के हमलो के बाद पाकिस्तान पर दबाव डालकर वहांके सरकार क