Skip to main content

Li Keqiang's economy centric tour; does it help build peace?

Optimism must translate into action
Li Keqiang, Premier of People’s Republic of China’s State Council visited India during 19-22 May 2013. This was the first step in Premier Li’s first foreign tour after assuming the office in March this year and the Chinese media and officials, among others, highlighted the fact that he chose India as his first stop. Many are willing to consider this alongside Preside Xi Jinping’s first state visit to Moscow after becoming the President to treat as a decided shift in China’s global priorities or at least as a rise of a new perspective in Chinese foreign policy. In undertaking this visit, the Chinese Premier has also overlooked the protocol as it was Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s turn to visit China after Wen Jiabao had visited India in December 2010 to commemorate the 60th Anniversary of the diplomatic contact between the two countries. 
However, this kind of attention to India does little to improve the bilateral relationship as little has happened that would translate this warmth into anything more substantial as well as lasting. Instead, this visit has further highlighted the perception gap between the strategic thinking of the two. High on symbolism and short on substance, Li Keqiang's India visit ended as such without achieving much sustainable. Except for showcasing the brownie point that Li chose India for his first official trip abroad, there is little that will have changed in the course of India China relations as a consequence of this visit.
In addition, coming in the aftermath of the Daulat Beg Oldi standoff that reminded of the Sumdorong Chu incidents of 1987 and the pre-1962 situation, this visit has done little to assure the Indian leadership of not repeating such incident or of the short and long term Chinese peaceful interest in South Asia. Now that the visit is over without anything unpleasant, it is a sigh of relief for the Chinese (and Indian) political leadership. On the other hand, the China has avoided an embarrassment for itself by settling the DBO aggression in time as India had threatened to call off the Premier’s visit and the External Affairs Minister’s visit to China before that. Had Premier Li's visit been cancelled, it would have been a major diplomatic blow as it wound have not only further increased India's regional profile as a rising player but  also would have firmed the belief of China being a confrontational power.
slowing growth, (From Economist)
At another level, given the structure of Li’s itinerary on this trip, avoiding India and still continuing with the rest of the program would have been a major diplomatic faux pas. This is because Li Keqiang could not have visited Pakistan without the India stopover. Premier Li was travelling with an economic itinerary and despite nearly $10 billion drop, India China bilateral trade still stood at $66 billion whereas China Pakistan bilateral trade is at $12 billion. India has much more to offer to the new leadership's socio-economic plans in China than Pakistan ever could.
Indeed, Li's other stops in Europe, Germany and Switzerland are also about China's domestic economic concerns. Having grown comfortably at about 10 percent per year for a substantial period of time, present day Chinese economy would struggle to achieve 7 percent without the stimulus. Also linked are the issues of regional, class and ethnic inequalities and the ultimate hanging sword of stability that the leadership hopes to pacify by course correction in its economy while at the same time sustaining its momentum. Thus, China needs economic engagement with the world's leading economies more than ever.
Despite high hopes and slogans, India China trade has not blossomed as expected. India hopes to get more access to Chinese markets in areas of pharmaceuticals, IT and ITES industries and similar areas in which restrictions remain. The $10 billion drop in the recent times has come in the backdrop of dwindling political confidence. while India has looked to partner dynamic economy of coastal China, In his public speech in Delhi, Li Keqiang has offered India a partnership in its western development strategy via improvements in trans-border trade which he mentioned on three separate instances.
In Pakistan, China's newer interest is about Afghanistan after the US withdrawal and protecting Chinese interests there. China will like to transfer the mineral and other riches from Afghanistan using Pakistan and PoK routes into Xinjiang. It could also use Pakistan's influence in safeguarding its investment interests in Afghanistan while for Pakistan's energy starved economy, China could provide an helping hand via mutually beneficial electricity and infrastructure development deals.   
In Germany, Li attention was on tax restrictions on Chinese telecom and solar products, double taxation issues and the Eurozone crisis. Allegations of dumping  and anti-dumping probes have rocked the blooming Eu-China trade. On the other hand China is discussing FTA with Switzerland and has started the initial discussions on this subject with the Swiss agencies.

Thus, Li Keqiang charted his first global itinerary with his sight firmly set on the domestic economic challenges. That the DBO standoff happened before it cast a shadow on the visit and also raised hopes for a political dialogue which was not to be. The strategic consensus that Premier Li and Chinese media stressed did not sizzle much in Delhi. Premier Li and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's joint press conference is a telling example of where the differences lie at the moment; while Li Keqiang spoke of the strategic consensus on regional and global issues, Prime Minister Singh highlighted tranquility on the border, correcting trade deficit and water issues as precondition to improving bilateral relations. major issues. All in all, the handshake across Himalayas will have to wait until there is a convergence of perceptions on what comes first.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Blame China? We are a House Divided One of the articles published in the Chinese Institute for International and Strategic Studies has talked of the ease with which India can be divided into 20-30 parts in the future to prevent the country from rising as a strategic rival for the top spot in Asia and in the world. This article has invoked a lot of heat and debate in India. This was expected given the fact that China is India’s rival and a strategic adversary in most of the situations. It is also somewhat surprising given the norms governing international relations that no one speaks so blatantly of dividing the neighbour, even if one so desired, more so if you take pride in your ‘peaceful rise’ in international relations. Moreover, the policy of beggar thy neighbour is simply dated in the era of economic cooperation and nuclear weapons. Even as the analysts in India get angry about the perception of certain Chinese scholar about India, they must not lose sight of the fact that the

Civil Military Relations and Media

In India, civil military relations have been strained in the recent past due to a couple of instances. First, it was the date of birth controversy about the serving Chief of the Army. It involved a few missing documents and a legal tangle. Even as it was solved with all honours retained, other set of controversies seem to have emerged. These new controversies perhaps have been blown out of proportion, probably because the DoB controversy was still fresh in mind. During this second phase of the controversy, corruption, under-performance and under-preparedness came into picture.  However, the icing on the cake was the whole supposed coup expose by the Indian Express. Figment of imagination, undoubtedly at its worst, was at play in creating a script that would crate yet another dud like Agent Vinod! Has the media been mature on reportage and expose? Its one thing for a letter to be leaked, but its completely different for the media to publish it without even giving it a second thou
संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन की विदेशनीती: आत्मविश्वास का अभाव अविनाश गोडबोले 2009 मे हुए चुनाव के बाद फिर एक बार कॉंग्रेसके नेतृतवमे संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन ने सरकार बनाया . इन चुनाओमे वामपंथी दल और समाजवादी पार्टी जैसे भूतपूर्व साथियोंको भारी नुकसान हुआ और UPA मे कॉंग्रेस का स्थान मज़बूत हो गया . इसका यह परिणाम अपेक्षित था के नयी सरकार एक सकारात्मक विचारधारा लेकर आगे चलेगी और देशके भविष्य के बारेमे दिशा दर्शक काम करेगी . 1996 से 2009 तक भारतमे बने हरेक सरकार मे मुख्य पार्टी कमज़ोर रही है और प्रादेशिक अथवा वैचारिक गठबंधन डालो की स्थिति मज़बूत और निर्णायक रही है. परिणामी सरकारोँकी नीतीयाभी छोटे दलोँके हितअनुसार बदलती रही है. जब 2009 के चुनाव मे कॉंग्रेस ने सबसे ज़्यादा सीट्स पाई थी. तब यह अंदाज़ जताया गया था की उसकी मज़बूती उसके आत्मविश्वास मे परिवर्तित हो सकती है लेकिन पिछलेएक साल का विश्लेषण करतहुए भारतीय विदेशनीतिमे ऐसा कोई बदल या ऐसी कोई घोषणा दिखाई नही दी है. 26/11 के हमलो के बाद पाकिस्तान पर दबाव डालकर वहांके सरकार क