Skip to main content
Sixty Years of The People’s Republic of China

The Peoples Republic of China will celebrate the 60th Anniversary of its Liberation on October 1 this year. The celebrations, confined to Beijing, have already begun and China is showing the world its achievements through the use of the state- controlled media. One visit to the website of the China Daily shows the theme which projects what the Chinese state wants to be known as. The banner on the website announcing the anniversary shows a high speed train and white pigeons flying around areas of green. The backdrop to this canvas of course remains red. The message is loud and clear and yet very simple; the People’s Republic wants to be known as a peacefully developing nation state under the guidance of the Chinese Communist Party. This banner also showcases the present leadership’s idea of the ‘Scientific Development Concept’, with stress on innovation, sustainability and inclusiveness as its core focus.

China has come a long way since Chairman Mao proudly declared “the Chinese people have stood up” to throw out imperialism and colonialism. A liberated China promised her people equality, freedom, development, self respect among other things. And one can see that through the mix of ideology and endeavour, innovation and trade, foreign support and domestic activity China has transformed itself from a country with extensive baggage of feudal history into the economic powerhouse in the world. Today one can love or hate China but can not ignore it anymore.

It is certainly true that the path to today’s China has not been smooth and the picture is less rosy than the leadership would have liked. The PRC has seen many upheavals ever since its inception. Some were natural, some man made and some that occurred because of the miscalculations of the leadership. First was the Korean War which changed the worldview of Mao. Followed by floods and droughts of 1950, the anti-rightist campaign the “Great Leap Forward”, the rural peoples’ communes, the greet famine and then came the Cultural Revolution which set back China’s development since liberation but also set a strong background for the subsequent reforms. It additionally drove home the importance of peaceful transition. It was followed by the reform period during which the Tiananmen Square incidents happened in May and June 1989. Tiananmen Square incidents taught the Chinese leadership on the importance of considering the adoption over the long run of reforms outside the economic sphere and of accommodating dissent.

However, through all these periods of uncertainty, domestically China has been able to achieve much more than what have many other nations that won their independence/liberation about the same time. The social transformation of China achieved under the Communist Party is nothing less than miraculous. China achieved remarkably on social indicators during Maoist era, simply because of its welfare policies. Maoist ideology was able to wipe out feudalism from most of China and implement egalitarian measures that were inclusive in nature. When the Chinese people followed Mao’s ideas en masse, it was not just because of blind faith but in a short period of time the Chinese State was able to create many stakeholders in the growth of the nation. This social uplifting helped China when economic reforms were implemented as the workforce needed to implement the reforms was readily available. This resulted in substantial increase in the country’s GDP and subsequently in its per capita income. Today China’s GDP is the second largest in the world in PPP terms.

China’s relations with the outside world has reflected its domestic issues. Once an exporter of Chinese style of Communism when it was isolated internationally and was surrounded by hostile powers, today’s China is the mainstay of the capitalist world exporting a large quantity of what the world imports. China played an important role in the recovery following the crisis in the Asian tigers in 1997. Its domestic development helped its role in the regional issues. In recent times, its importance is also exemplified in US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to China in which she urged China to play a leading role in solving the global financial crisis. This simple statement reflects the fact that the axis of the world order is changing and China is slowly but surely assuming the centre stage.

In India, much of the understanding of China percolates from the memories of the 1962 war. There is more mistrust and misconception about China’s intent amongst the masses, sometimes fanned, by a nationalist and occasionally, sensationalist media. The occasion of the 60th anniversary of Chinese Liberation should be used to understand China in a proper light. China will remain India’s competitor in many spheres of activity for a long time. However, this does not mean that it will necessarily be a threat to India’s integrity and identity. If China’s power appears intimidating then the solution is in knowing how to get there. India’s best response would be, while retaining its democratic polity, as well as its defence preparedness, to make economic growth its central task.

THIS COMMENTARY WAS PUBLISHED ON THE WEBSITE OF IDSA WHERE I WORK AS RESEARCH ASSISTANT

Comments

ambudon said…
Check out Pranab Bardhan's website. He is coming with a book comparing India and China. The first chapter is on his website.

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore Summit and China’s Strategic Assumptions in East Asia

Thus it appears as if after pulling out a credible Iran deal, one which has enough checks and balances as well as involvement of other like-minded countries, The US President   Donald Trump gave away a lot in Singapore in return little verifiable in return from Kim. It appears as if North Korea, a de-facto nuclear power, is the bigger winner out of the Singapore summit. Donald Trump did have his moment of unilateral glory in Singapore but if Japan and South Korea came out on top, then they would have more reasons to worry. Moreover, China’s headaches would rise were they to act on those worries. Until the Singapore summit, Donald Trump and Kim Jong un had fairly same reasons for direct talks. For Trump it was his desire to stamp the American supremacy. He sought to show China its place, after years of engagement policy by Obama by first completely discrediting the Six Party talks which were not only China-initiated but also China-led. He used social media on one...

ग्रंथविश्व : पर्यावरणवादाच्या ‘बायबल’ची पन्नाशी महत्त्वाची कशी?

‘सायलेंट स्प्रिंग’ या रॅशेल कार्सन यांनी लिहिलेल्या पुस्तकाची पहिली आवृत्ती अमेरिकेत २७ सप्टेंबर १९६२ रोजी प्रकाशित झाली. म्हणजे आता या पुस्तकाला ५० वर्षे पूर्ण झाली आहेत. गेल्या अर्धशतकात या पुस्तकाचे अनेक भाषांमधील अनुवाद प्रसिद्ध झाले, इंग्रजीत तर अनेकानेक आवृत्त्याही निघाल्या. त्याहीपेक्षा महत्त्वाचे म्हणजे, ‘सायलेंट स्प्रिंग’मध्ये मांडलेल्या संकल्पनांवर आणि त्यामागल्या तत्त्वज्ञानावर आधारलेली अनेक पुस्तके पुढल्या काळात लिहिली गेली. आजच्या लोकसत्तेत प्रकाशित लेख . याची मूळ इंग्लिश आवृत्ति लवकरच ब्लॉग वर टाकेन! My article in today's Marathi paper Loksatta. It is on the 50th anniversary of Rachel Carson's seminal book Silent Spring. I will publish the English version of this article on this blog asap!
Having known south Mumbai in minute details and knowing this area well, having walked around extensively to be at the Gateway to inhale a sense of freedom that the air in this part of country gives, I, a diehard Mumbaikar, am particularly disturbed by the war that these terrorists have waged on my city and my country. I just keep getting the feeling all through these times that I am in deep sleep and this is one of those nightmares I will forget after waking up. I wish. The pain of the victims’ families and the destruction are heartbreaking but what bothers me more is the shallowness expressed by some of our citizen, who are famous for being famous, in this hour of serious contemplation. I am talking of the Suhel Seth phenomena. He was loud and clear in his criticism not just of the terrorists but also equally of government mechanism and apparatus. The problem I have in this is not just that his criticism of the system in the situation is unfair, but he was jumping the guns too early....